![]() ![]() The Fantastic Beasts series seemed to experience a major shift at their midpoint while originally it seemed like the prequel series would be little more than a few silly monster adventures and capers set within the Wizarding World, it became clear that the franchise was being used to show the extended backstory of the first "Wizarding War." While fans may disagree with this change of direction, it certainly made more sense to feature Dumbledore as a more prominent part of the series. We see some of the same playfulness that would become common to the character in the Harry Potter series during the final battle, Dumbledore gifts the muggle baker David Kowalski ( Dan Fogler) with a wand and offers him words of inspiration that allow him to show bravery in the face of evil. While there’s still the same sense of mystery to him, Law includes a youthful whimsy that is distinct. Law shows more emotional vulnerability within Dumbledore, but still has his charisma. It is still rather tame, in what could have been a great opportunity for major LGBTQ inclusion in a blockbuster series. Not only was Mads Mikkelsen a better choice to play the series antagonist, but the film spends more time focusing on both men’s heartbreak. ![]() Thankfully, Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore improves on its predecessor in nearly every way. Although Rowling has never offered any condolenscens to the fans thay were offended by her rhetoric, Warner Brothers Discovery CEO David Zazlav seems intent on developing the series further, suggesting he's open to working with Rowling again. Rowling, whose transphobic comments have made many longtime Wizarding World fans contemplate their dedication to series. Controversy continues to surround original Harry Potter author J.K. Following the underperformance of the third Fantastic Beasts film at the box office, its unclear if Warner Brothers is still intent on continuing the series to reach its intended fourth and fifth chapters. However, it appears that Dumbledore's adventures on screen may have reached a standstill. The prequel series decided to show a younger version of Dumbledore, and Jude Law first appeared in the second film, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald. He was subsequently replaced in the next film by another acclaimed English thespian, Michael Gambon. I wonder how Michael Gambon would have performed Dumbledore yelling 'SILENCE' if he were cast in Philsopher's Stone.The legendary British actor Richard Harris was cast in Christopher Columbus’ Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Apprentice, but he tragically passed away after The Chamber of Secrets wrapped filming. Btw, the word "HAS" in capital letters, is not necesary at all. So, ladies and gentleman, if you don't answer, I'll erase it. Gambon is not when he acts as Dumbledore). That's why his portrayal of Dumbledore is very different than Harris', and the Dumbledore character itself (in the books, Dumbledore is calmed. And yes, in the POA interviews he says this. That's no misleading, it's actually his true words. Also, he always stated that he just plays himself. Gambon has always stated that he didn't read the books, just saw the first two films. I’m not really a character actor at all." " I never ease into a role – every part I play is just a variant of my own personality. I just stick on a beard and play me, so it's no great feat. Similarly, he has also mislead another interviewer to believe that, when playing Dumbledore, he doesn't "have to play anyone really. "Despite having deliberately mislead an interviewer (something Gambon enjoys doing often, to mix things up a bit), he HAS read the books, as evidenced in the Prisoner of Azkaban interviews. Cavalier One ( Wizarding Wireless Network) 11:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC) WHAT'S THIS? I agree that removal of the information at the present time is probably the best course as it is subjective and without verification, but - if readded in the future with proper neutrality and sources - I see no reason not to keep it. Ideally, there should be a counterpoint with support for Gambon's portrayal, again properly sourced. They should be presented in a neutral format, with no bias either way as to Gambon's performance, simply stating that these views are out there. Jayden Matthews 11:05, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Īctually, reaction towards Gambon's portrayal could be included if they are properly sourced to a reputable site or person (critics, high profile film sites or agencies, news agencies etc), not fansites or forums. 194.78.37.122 11:02, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Īgreed, weather or not people liked him is a matter of opinion, the article should be neatural. It's about how bad Gambon plays the part and since it lacks any sources I'll just delete some of it. The introduction is very subjective and needs to be changed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |